what photo supreme can do that lightroom can not

My concern is that the same will happen with Lightroom, and one day soon you will only access the software by paying a monthly reoccurring fee. In fact, my biggest disappointment in losing Aperture was not the software product itself, but Apple handing Adobe a monopoly in this software space.Īcross its other products, Adobe has been pushing consumers towards a subscription model for some time now. This is a bit of a soapbox, but one important enough for me to mention: I don’t care for many of Adobe’s business practices. Until then, Apple will continue support for Aperture within Yosemite. Aperture is far from perfect, but I can live with its shortcomings for a few more months, and anything I do in my Aperture library will continue to be forwards compatible with Photos and/or a Lightroom migration. Or, even if these new tools are leveraged, that doesn’t mean it’ll plug the holes and make it a competitor to Lightroom, but for me it’s worth the wait. It’ll take time for developers to leverage this and we simply don’t know what they will do with it. Photos is also more than just an application, it’s a system-wide framework that allows extensions to access your photo library like never before.

Apple is surely planning updates to the software, whether or not they fill those gaps.

That said, there is still a lot we don’t know. There is a lot of core functionality in Photos that is simply lacking, eliminating any appeal to advanced users in its current state.

But, for those who haven’t done so yet, I want to share my reasons for staying put just awhile longer. To be clear, I’m not advocating for you to do the same - in fact, switching to Lightroom will likely be the right decision for many users. Are we coming in for a landing, or just taking off? How apropos…Īs we digest all of this news, I want to add one more admittedly minority voice to the mix: why I’m staying with Aperture, at least for now.

What photo supreme can do that lightroom can not